THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
12/05/14 -- Vol. 33, No. 23, Whole Number 1835
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent or posted will be assumed authorized for
inclusion unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The latest issue is at http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm.
Topics:
A Second Opinion (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
From My In-Box: Internet Reviewing (comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
FIELD OF FANTASIES edited by Rick Wilber (book review
by Joe Karpierz)
A GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT (film review by Mark
R. Leeper)
Pluto, THE GREAT RUPERT, Robert A. Heinlein, Antarctica
(letter of comment by Joseph T. Major)
Dogs (letter of comment by John Purcell)
This Week's Reading (Loeb Classical Library, book sales,
and MURDER IN MESOPOTAMIA) (book comments
by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: A Second Opinion (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
I read in the Berkeley Wellness letter about the recent medical
finding that you will probably have a longer lifespan if you are
overweight than if you are underweight. It was shown a while back
that you can extend your lifespan if you live on a starvation diet.
So, I guess, modern medicine recommends that you starve yourself
but do not lose weight. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: From My In-Box: Internet Reviewing (comments by Mark
R. Leeper)
A reader of my reviews on the Internet wanted to know a little
about being an on-line reviewer. I thought it would be a
reasonable idea to share my answers with the VOID readers.
> As an online movie reviewer do studios provide you with an early
> release of most films so that you can review them or are you
> relegated to seeing films in the theater during its premiere
> week?
Under normal circumstances I do not get to big-screen showings of
films, though I am invited. They are offered to me, but the
showings are usually in Manhattan. Tolls and parking would make
"free" screenings prohibitively expensive. The last time I tried
going into Manhattan for a screening there was no parking to be had
at any price. I had to turn around and just go home. (Actually,
to a Hoboken restaurant on the way.)
I do get offered screener DVDs and streaming links so I can see
films that distributors would like me to review. I much prefer
discs to links since it is nice to have a souvenir of the film.
One particular distribution company makes lots of offers of
screeners and sometimes they even send me discs that I have said I
was not interested in. I do admit that frequently they prove me
wrong. The film can be more interesting than I expected and they
get a review.
As a side note, I have never dealt with a publicist who acted any
differently if I really liked or really hated the film. I guess
for them even a negative review is publicity. They may tell me
they like a film when they are offering it, but that is as far as
they ever go in influencing my opinion. As with book reviewers,
getting copies of possible reviewable material is a major perk, but
I do pay for it in effort writing the review. And I am not a fast
writer.
One disadvantage to getting films this way is that they are often
monogrammed, so the movie says across the screen something like
"Property of XYZ Distribution. Do not duplicate." It's a minor
distraction usually. Other times they will send you the DVD in a
case that is exactly what they will be selling on the shelf. That
may be a much more polished version of the film and may have
features like interviews and subtitles or closed captioning.
If any film you get this way gets pirated, they supposedly have
ways to track down who betrayed the trust of the distributor. I
have no experience with this, and I have no sympathy for video
pirates.
As I said above this is how things are done under normal
circumstances. I am a member of the On-line Film Critics Society
(OFCS), which makes its own set of awards. Filmmakers want to be
able to say their films are award=winning so are anxious to get
reviewers to look at their product. That means in November and
December I will be sent on the order of fifty screener discs for
award consideration. These may come from minor releasing companies
and they might come from major studios. Last year I got some big
ones like FROZEN and 12 YEARS A SLAVE and little ones you will
never hear of. Sadly there is a trend to make these films
available by streaming rather then sending discs. That makes the
films less convenient to watch and sometimes are really difficult
to watch. Streaming is still not a reliable way to watch a film.
There is no pleasure like desperately looking for where I can see a
film like EUROPA REPORT, failing to find it, and then to find it
showing up in my mailbox.
I am not paid for my reviews by anyone. I review films because I
love cinema and I don't expect to be rewarded. Like the prostitute
said, if you get paid for it then it isn't love. But getting
screeners to first-class films is as near as I get to any sort of
reward.
> Do you have any advice for someone who wants to review films
> online?
Sure. But it will mostly seem like platitudes. Just because a
piece of advice is a platitude does not mean that it is not true.
-- Love movies.
-- Watch a lot of movies, American and foreign, early silent films
to what's playing right now. Get a good background. Get so you
can tell what films influenced current films.
-- Write at least fifty film reviews a year. Put them on a web
page. OFCS requires fifty a year or a darn good excuse why you
wrote fewer.
-- Once you have the volume of reviews join a film society like
OFCS. If you are in a film society you can publish your reviews in
the respected areas on the Rotten Tomatoes site. Otherwise they
put your reviews in the "Peanut Gallery." That is what I call
their Audience Reviews section of the page. Anyone can submit
reviews there, I think. And you can tell that they are non-
selective. But having your reviews show up in the Peanut Gallery
section is better than not being published at all, I guess. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: A GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT (film review by Mark
R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: Iranian-American Ana Lily Amirpour wrote and directed this
film, setting the film in the quiet town in Iran aptly named Bad
City. This could be American suburbia--in fact it was shot in
Bakersfield, California--but for the vampire stalking the streets
at night. The film is atmospheric, but the dialog is in Farsi, the
story is hard to follow, and scenes proceed slowly punctuated with
sparse dialog. It is an unusual film, but it comes to an end
without the viewer recognizing a story in what we have seen.
Rating: high +1 (-4 to +4) or 6/10
Arash (played by Arash Varandi) leads a hard life in Bad City,
Iran. He takes care of his father and tries unsuccessfully to keep
his father Hossein (Marshall Manesh) off of heroin. Arash has one
prize possession, his Ford Thunderbird Coup. But the drug pusher
who sells Arash heroin has not been paid and on one visit grabs
Arash's car keys and takes Arash's car. Arash takes out his
unhappiness by going to a party dressed as Dracula. In this
condition he meets on the street The Girl (Sheila Vand). The Girl
has a striking appearance herself. Over a striped T-shirt she
wears a chador like a hood and a cape. It is an interesting
transition of image turning a chador into a melodramatic cape,
playing off of the fears of many Americans for things Islamic.
While Arash pretends to be a vampire under his cape, The Girl under
her own cape hides the fact that she really is a vampire. But as
luck would have it, she is only pretending not to be a supernatural
bloodsucker of the night. She is pretending not to have the
supernatural, superhuman powers of the undead. The viewer sees her
mostly in the half-light of night, and it creates an image that
sticks in the viewer's memory.
A GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT was written and directed by Ana
Lily Amirpour. It is an expanded version of an 8-minute short of
the same title that Amirpour made three years ago. She set her
film in Bad City in Iran (is that really the name of a town?) but
shot it in the United States in Bakersfield, California. The film
is directed deadly seriously, but there are comic touches. At one
point the story advances to the music of a spaghetti Western in
Ennio Morricone's distinctive style. Vampire fangs seem to be
spring-loaded. The pace is slow so it feels like there is very
little story there. The film lacks any sort of a conclusion and
there is very little finality at the end of the film. But story is
not really the point of this film. It is more an exercise in style
in black and white. I admit I had problems recognizing characters
when they showed up dressed differently against a different
background. But I felt compelled to go with the film.
The production style is straightforward and simple. Though filmed
in the United States, we see not how Iran is different from the
United States, but how it is similar. Perhaps this is a different
world that mixes American and Iranian background. Much of the film
is about the drug culture. The film has one scene of breast nudity
that we would probably not see in an Iranian film.
A GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT is a nice atmospheric exercise in
horror filmmaking, light-years away from the sort of gory horror
film popular in the US, but it will lose points for having so
little story. It is not that any of the ideas are startlingly new,
but it is very original to set a traditional vampire story in
someplace as unexpected as Iran. I would rate A GIRL WALKS HOME
ALONE AT NIGHT a high +1 on the -4 to +4 scale or 6/10.
Film Credits:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2326554/combined
What others are saying:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/a_girl_walks_home_alone_at_night/
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: FIELD OF FANTASIES edited by Rick Wilber (copyright 2014,
Nightshade Books, $15.99, 309pp, ISBN-13 978-1-59780-548-3)
(excerpt from the Duel Fish Codices: a book review by Joe Karpierz)
All right, I have a confession to make: I love baseball. I grew
up playing it, although not very well. I watched it daily on
television, bought baseball cards, read baseball books (I know,
weird, something other than SF), and went to Wrigley Field several
times a year with my parents to see the Chicago Cubs play (longtime
readers may remember that I reviewed Joe Dimaggio's biography back
in 2005--yeah, I had to go look it up--so they may not be surprised
by any of these revelations).
And even back then I had a love of science fiction, starting with
things like STAR TREK, LOST IN SPACE, and 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY.
What could be better than a book of stories that combined my love
of baseball with my love of science fiction? And lo and behold,
there came a book, edited by Rick Wilber, called FIELD OF
FANTASIES, a collection of baseball short stories that have just a
bit of a twist to them, just a bit of an off-kilter angle, just a
bit of supernatural. You can imagine I jumped on this one.
FIELD OF FANTASIES collects baseball stories as old as 1944 and as
recent as 2012, from authors that are known to fans of speculative
fiction such as Stephen King, Harry Turtledove, Rod Serling,
Gardner Dozois, Ray Bradbury, John Kessel, Kim Stanely Robinson,
and Rick Wilber himself to more mainstream folks like Jack Kerouac,
Louise Marley, Robert Coover, and others. While not all the
stories here deal with the "Strange and Supernatural" (part of the
subtitle to the book), every last one of these is a gem.
With that being the case, where do I begin? For pure amusement,
Gardner Dozois' "The Hanging Curve" tops the list, about a
curveball that literally hung there, in front of the plate--for
years. Following on the heels of that tale is "McDuff on the
Mound", by Robert Coover, wherein we see the story of Casey at the
Bat from the viewpoint of the pitcher in that poem. For pure
baseball entertainment, "Pitchers and Catchers", by Cecilia Tan,
gives us the story a catcher trying to make the Red Sox in Spring
Training and how, just for one spring, a catcher brings both
pitchers and catchers together in a competition for the ages, only
to fall victim to reality at the end of it all. Kim Stanley
Robinson's "Arthur Sternbach Brings the Curveball to Mars" brings
hope to every kid who wants to be good at the game and finally
finds a way to do just that.
There are a slew of thought-provoking stories in here too. Louise
Marley's "Diamond Girls" tells the story about a genetically
engineered woman in the major leagues that tells us quite a bit
about how players who are not like the others can be treated by
fellow players, fans, and the press. "A Face in the Crowd", by
Stephen King and Stewart O'Nan, tells the poignant tale of a man
who is devoting his life to watching baseball after his wife passes
away, and what he ends up learning by giving in to his passion for
the game. Valerie Sayers' "How to Read a Man" tells us about a
lifelong baseball fan who can tell what a player will do on a
particular at bat just by watching him, but can't quite figure out
how to deal with the men in her life. "My Kingdom for Jones",
while on the surface a comedy about a horse that can play third
base, actually gives us insight as to how we treat outsiders in our
lives. David Sandner and Jacob Weisman give us "Lost October",
about an old man and his young friend who have baseball in common,
and how, in the face of what we presume is the earthquake that
interrupted the Bay Series in 1989 (San Francisco vs. Oakland),
they come together in true love for the past of the game in an
ethereal ballpark that seems to be host to a game from the distant
past. Rick Wilber gives us "Stephen to Cora to Joe", a take on
Tinkers to Evers to Chance, about a player trying to make it in the
game and the realities of it all, with the help of some literary
figures from the past.
Oh, there are other stories here that are worth mentioning as well.
Every last one of them is terrific. Even if you're not a baseball
fan, I think you'll find these stories engaging and delightful.
After all, you need something to do between now and Spring
Training, less than three months away. [-jak]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Pluto, THE GREAT RUPERT, Robert A. Heinlein, Antarctica
(letter of comment by Joseph T. Major)
In response to Mark's comments on science in the popular media in
the 11/28/14 issue of the MT VOID, Joseph Major writes:
"Pluto may be again a planet."
I believe this was a hoax article. [-jtm]
Mark responds:
Apparently there has been some reconsideration on Pluto since it
was discovered it had moons and an atmosphere. It was not a hoax
or at least SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN did not think it was a hoax when
they covered it: http://tinyurl.com/mtv-pluto
I believe there is also the argument that there is no way to find
out if exo-planets clean up their orbit and astronomers don't want
to give up on calling exo-planets planets. [-mrl]
"THE GREAT RUPERT (1950)"
According to Bill Patterson's biography of Heinlein, the financial
deal ended up partnering the film with DESTINATION MOON. They
were, Patterson says, concerned that DESTINATION MOON would not do
well in release, and therefore partnering it with a movie that
looked like it would do well (a Christmas movie about a cute
squirrel) that would cover any losses.
Then, DESTINATION MOON did well and THE GREAT RUPERT tanked.
(Incidentally, the latter movie has been retitled A CHRISTMAS WISH:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042524/.)
Heinlein got next to no money for all his effort in making the
movie.
THE PUPPET MASTERS (NHOL G.091). Heinlein had a "thing" for
nudism, and like too many writers, assumed that the whole would
adopt his own values. If FOR US, THE LIVING (NHOL G.004) had been
available then, people would have seen that this attitude dated
back to his earliest days. And have entirely given up on reading
him.
The book was "cut" twice, once by Walter Bradbury, the editor at
Doubleday, and again by Horace Gold for serialization in GALAXY.
Some of the cut material explained plot points, but on the whole,
the cut volume was more readable. [-jtm]
Mark responds:
I never heard THE GREAT RUPERT was associated with DESTINATION MOON
beyond being just another George Pal film, but I can believe it.
[-mrl]
"ANTARCTICA: A YEAR ON ICE"
Did Powell (interesting coincidence, since people encountering the
name "Anthony Powell" are more likely to think of the author of A
DANCE TO THE MUSIC OF TIME) mention the 300 Club? I would also
recommend reading BIG DEAD PLACE: INSIDE THE STRANGE AND MENACING
WORLD OF ANTARCTICA (2005) by Nick Johnson (who, sorry to say,
committed suicide in 2012).
ANTARCTICA: A YEAR ON ICE: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2361700/
[-jtm]
Mark responds:
I don't remember a mention of the 300 Club in ANTARCTICA: A YEAR ON
ICE. I doubt it got a mention. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Dogs (letter of comment by John Purcell)
In response to Mark's comments on dogs in the 11/28/14 issue of the
MT VOID, John Purcell writes:
In response to Mark's response to my e-moc (email of comment), I
understood completely what he was getting at a couple weeks ago.
We, too, know people who own dogs who are kind and loving, but
shouldn't own a dog. They leave their pets either kenneled or
outside all day while they're at work, and board the dogs when they
go out of town. To address this problem, myself, wife, and
daughter started up a home business where they would dog-sit for
people. For about five years they did pretty well, but once our
daughter moved out into her own home a few years back, that
business fizzled out. There's a big need for this kind of thing in
College Station, being a university town, and it pains us to
recognize unwilling abandonment or neglect by people who really
should know better. Yes, it is a problem rarely discussed.
It's good to get that cleared up. Now, about that movie you
alluded to as your December pick-of-the-month: it's too bad that
later retread expeditions couldn't have left their versions on that
island instead. That would have saved the rest of us a lot of
anguish. [-jp]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
A couple of weekends ago was a sort of mini-book-sale period, with
a stop at the Cranbury Book Worm and the Cherry Hill Library
Friends of the Library book sale on the way to Philcon.
For anyone looking for Loeb Classical Library (Greek) books, run,
do not walk, to the Cranbury Book Worm. They just got about ten
shelf-feet of them. We did not buy any of those, but we did get a
science fiction art book, a book on Egypt, a coffee table
philosophy book, and the Criterion edition of TIME BANDITS.
At the Friends of the Library sale, we got a couple of VHS tapes
(LES MISERABLES and LAND OF THE PHARAOHS) and a few books,
including a reference book on film noir and some essays of Edward
Sapir. VHS tapes were 25 cents each, even for Disney films. They
have expanded the sale to the lower lobby as well, but there were
still a lot of boxes under tables, and one woman was complaining
that all the fiction tables were hardbacks or trade paperbacks, and
all the mass market fiction was on the floor where it was hard to
get to for older people.
At Philcon, we found nothing of interest in the Dealers Room. A
lot of it is not books, and almost all the book tables are new
books and small press books. The Golden Age of used paperbacks is
gone. However, the freebie table was doing a land office business.
Someone dropped off about a dozen feet of comic books, and many
people seem to have brought stacks of books (we brought four bags'
worth).
Of MURDER IN MESOPOTAMIA by Agatha Christie (ISBN 978-0-062-07390-
7), I have only two new observations [SPOILER ALERT]:
Christie jumps from Nurse Leatheran's point of view to someone
else's point of view for two paragraphs, mostly to insert something
more meaningful the second time through.
The question of how anyone could have been tracking Louise all her
life well enough to contact her whenever she started to have a
serious romance is never explained. [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
Life is one long process of getting tired.
--Samuel Butler